Why work does not often happen at work – Featuring Jason Fried
Common: Come the end of the day, little can be shown for hours of “work” at the office.
Uncommon: When asked the question, “Where do you go when you really need to get something done?” people do not respond in ways businesses expect. For a boss or company owner, the ideal answer would likely be “work.” But it seldom is.
This is a fascinating and important observation. There is no doubt about it: The world is changing and it is impacting all arenas of life – especially the way we approach one of our most consuming activities: Our occupation, career, and working life.
In a speech at the revered TED conferences, entrepreneur and author, Jason Fried explores how the idea of “work” and how we should go about it to be most effective and efficient. Below is his speech. I have outlined many of his main points for reference.
3 Responses:
When asked “Where do you go when you really need to get something done?” people often give one of three answers:
- A place, location, or room: The porch, deck, kitchen, basement, coffee shop, park, library, etc.
- A moving object/environment: Train, Plane, Car
- A time: “It doesn’t matter where I am as long as it’s early in hte morning, late at night, or a weekend.”
This place called work:
- When a company hires employees they expect quality work from them. And many companies assume the most effective way to draw this “work” from them is to bring them together in one place: The office.
- Companies spend a huge amount of resources to locate, purchase/lease, and furnish a building to create a structured “work” environment called an “office” yet the team they are creating this space for claim their best work is done outside of the office.
- When people go to work, they trade in their day for a series of “work moments” – the “work day” does not exist anymore.
- The office is like a Cuisinart: You walk in and your day is shredded to bits. You may get 5, 10, 15, or maybe 30 minute increments of work before 5pm appears and you realize you have done very little “work.”
- A series of tasks often divert meaningful work.
What is effected?
- Productivity, effectiveness, contentment, and creativity is compromised.
- In creative industries especially (designers, programmers, writers, engineers, thinkers) people need long stretches of uninterrupted time to generate quality ideas and results.
- Even though the work day is typically 8 hours, most people are lucky to get 1-2 hours of uninterrupted time at the office.
Sleep, a metaphor:
- Sleep and work are closely related. You cannot get quality sleep in short bursts.
- Sleep and work are stage/phase based.
- There are 5 stages of sleep. To get to the “deep,” meaningful stages, you have to first undergo the early ones. If you are interrupted half way through, you do not pick up where you left off. You must start over.
- You don’t go to sleep; you go towards sleep – and if you are interrupted you won’t get quality rest.
- Would you expect someone to sleep well if they were constantly interrupted? Of course not? Then why do we expect people to perform well at work when they are constantly interrupted?
2 types of interruptions:
- A common excuse managers give: If I can’t see them, how do I know they are working? I can’t let them work from home with distractions such as TV, the internet, the dog, etc. But these are all voluntary distractions – we must decide to turn on the TV, to check Facebook, etc.
- At work, most of the distractions are involuntary. Managers often have you believe the most costly distractions are Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube, etc. – these are just modern-day “smoke breaks.”
- The real problems are “M&Ms” – Managers and Meetings. And these are found primarily in… the office.
- All the places people cite for being most productive you will not find M&Ms.
- Meetings are much more disruptive than they are beneficial. Most meetings do not need to take place.
- Meetings procreate and lead to more meetings
- Companies often look at a 1 hour meeting as a 1 hour meeting – this is only the case if there is one person in the meeting. If 10 people meet for 1 hour, it is a 10 hour meeting.
3 practical suggestions:
- How do you get someone to say, “When I really want to get stuff done, I go to the office.”
- We’ve heard of casual Fridays, but how about No-talk Thursdays? Pick one Thursday per month where employees cannot talk to one another. Uninterrupted time is the best gift you can give someone at work.
- Switch from active collaboration (in-person) to passive models of communication such as email, IM, or other tech platforms. You can close or quit your email, email, etc., but you can’t avoid an in-person distraction in the office.
- Cancel meetings. Don’t just “move” the meeting; cancel them and never have it. You will find that the most important things always get done in the end.
Who is Jason Fried?
Jason Fried is the co-founder and President of 37signals, the Chicago-based web-application company. He has co-authored all of 37signals’ books, including the upcoming, “Rework,” as well as the ‘minimalist manifesto,’ “Getting Real: The Smarter, Faster, Easier Way to Build a Successful Web Application” He also helps to maintain the company’s popular blog, Signal vs. Noise, and is regularly invited to speak around the world on entrepreneurship, design, management, and software.
Your thoughts?
Unconventional thoughts about work often create many mixed feelings. What your thoughts about Jason’s ideas? Have personal experiences to share? Please post your comments below.
Stay uncommon,
Thanks for reading. Hope to see you in the comments section below. For new & different content, let's meet here:
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram
Some organizations are big enough to hide the inefficiencies so they really don’t pay any attention to dissatisfied workers. I think they don’t see what you maintain that “so much money and time is wasted by organizational stubbornness.” Their eyes are focused elsewhere.
And so senior staff/workers head for the exit and the door is help open for them. What a shame! In the case of non-profits donors don’t often see all this happening behind the scenes which is problematic for organizational accountability.
Such books don’t always make managers happy! I showed this to the leadership of a non-profit I worked in for many years. Bought copies for everyone in the leadership team. It was a total non-event. There was 0% interest in discussing any of the principles.
Big organizations that have a certain age are kind of like aircraft carriers. They don’t change directions very easily. And you really don’t want to get in their way!
I agree with you there. I have experienced the same push back many times in conversations about productivity with older and larger corporations. I feel strongly that, in the end, that same stubbornness will only damage their ability to do business effectively and efficiently. I have found this to be very true in the non-profit sector as well. I have worked with several NPs and after seeing how they run their “business” I don’t think I would donate my money to them because the return on those dollars (measured by the good they can provide) is often very poor. So much money and time is wasted by organizational stubbornness. This is not to say there is one single cure-all process for everyone, but any business that is not constantly looking to improve their modes of efficiency and effectiveness may as well be shopping for a tombstone.
Kent – your comments to Alex put me in mind of a book that I found very helpful. It is called BUILT TO LAST. Have you read it? In many ways it touches on the sacred cows of the corporate world.
I have read Good to Great but not Built to Last. Have heard good things about it though. It is on my long list of books to read. 🙂 Will definitely get there eventually.
Great message here! Though, for myself, even though my role would be a thinker and creator at a job site, I want to interact with others to get help when I am stuck with a problem. Also, I enjoy helping others when they need help. My performance is affected more by a manager that is difficult to work with. I’d like a manager who is almost as understanding, supportive, and positive as a psychologist, and a great friend! 🙂
You raise a good point Alex. Each work environment should be somewhat contingent on the goals of business and the type of work. I still believe that some level of interaction is healthy and conducive of creativity. But with that said, in many work environments I see so much productivity wasted by constant interruptions – many initiated with positive intentions. I feel a good manager and a good company should find creative ways to balance both interaction and isolation in a way that is appropriate for the goals at hand. Thanks for your thoughts Alex.
Great food for thought Kent! Even though I work from home I sometimes go elsewhere to be able to concentrate. My last few years at a large non-profit were cubicle years. I think that I can concur that those office days were not very productive. I believe that part of the problem is the management philosophy that goes with the office environment. I found this to be a sacred cow. Moo!!
[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Paige Buck, Carolyn Ray. Carolyn Ray said: Why work doesn't get done at work. The answer: M&Ms (it's not what you think) http://bit.ly/eYhdFL #communication #leadership #work […]
Saved as a favorite, I really like your site! 🙂
[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Kent Healy, Kent Healy. Kent Healy said: New Post: Why work does not often happen at work – Featuring Jason Fried http://t.co/cqWxODh […]