Why “whatever it takes” is a flawed strategy
by Kent Healy, 2 comments.
⇒15 Dec 2011
Common: Passionate ignorance disguised as commitment
Uncommon: After centuries of use, someone thought it necessary to improve upon the cannon. While still effective, there was a problem. Once in flight, the cannonball could not be intentionally stopped or redirected.
Then came the smart missile… it could adjust to conditions, respond to new information, and yes, could even abort the mission altogether. Given the two options, the logical strategy is that of the smart missile.
But this is not the approach many people choose when creating their lives. They take the form of the cannonball, relying on established mass, momentum, and brute force to take them to their destination. The cannonball can plow through many barriers with impressive resolve. This is very similar to the ‘whatever it takes’ method – a display of dogged tenacity towards a predetermined target.
But in life, our targets (end goals) rarely sit in one place waiting to connect with a unidirectional object (you, the pursuer).












Recent Comments